Friday, December 20, 2019

Moving Out

I did not want to empty my office in a blizzard. When a sunny and fairly warm Friday arrived early this month, it was time: I rented a U-Haul truck, and with considerable assistance from my friend John Cowan moved most of my things to a storage unit. Since then, only a few things remain, few enough that I can easily load them in the Prius C and be out of the church in about a half-hour when the Last Day comes.

I had packed my clavichord into its shipping case; it was the only large piece, joined by the white wooden chair made by my great-grandfather and a few other small pieces of furniture. The organ music went into boxes, saving out only what I needed for the remaining weeks. The books had come home bit by bit over the last month, a few in my carry bag every day. Photos and diplomas went into boxes, as did my CD recordings. I shifted my work to a laptop, packing away my desktop computer, a twin of one that is at home, to serve as its backup after we move. Thanks to Marie Kondo, surprisingly little needed to go into recycling, the dumpster, or the thrift store. I had already done most of that when I worked through my things, seeking those that spark joy and saying farewell to the rest.

And it is no longer my office. Nineteen years and more it has been, the longest I have been in one place in this lifetime. More of my waking hours were at the church than at home, and the office bore more of my personality than anything in our apartment.

In that lies a challenge for the coming year: can I find a Home in our new home, yet to be found? Beyond that, can I find a Life when so much of my life energy has been tied up in the church and its music?

I got a clue from a long interview with Tulsi Gabbard, the presidential candidate that I wholeheartedly support. To paraphrase, she spoke of the quiet life that would be her “selfish interest” as she called it, home in Hawaii, surfing every day. But asking “what do I want, what would make me happy” rather than finding the real happiness that is “service to God, service to others… service above self” leads to the question “What is it all for?”

If I craft a nice comfortable little niche, playing my clavichord and piano every day, reading books, doing nothing for others, then it is all about myself. But “Is today the day? Any day could be your last. What are you doing with this time?” That is why she is spending this winter in places like Iowa and New Hampshire instead of Hawaii, and why she walks the path that is hers. [these thoughts and quotes are from around the 42 to 46 minute mark in the video]

I do not know what path is mine, not after December 31. But after the political campaign is over, I plan to keep Tulsi’s bumper sticker on my Prius: “Service above self.” I will need that reminder even more in retirement than I do now.

----------------
As I wrote several months ago, I chose to support Tulsi because of her courage in standing up to the corrupt Clinton/DNC machine in the 2016 primaries and supporting Bernie Sanders, courage that was again displayed this week when she refused to support the rush to impeachment that is polarizing the country.

Back in May, I thought that I was finding in Tulsi a political candidate that I could follow and support. I did not then know that I was also finding a spiritual guide and example.

There are three other Democratic candidates that I admire and like: Andrew Yang, Bernie Sanders, Marianne Williamson. But on caucus night in a few weeks, I will stand up for Tulsi. And beyond that, whether she wins or (more likely) falls short, I will honor her and seek to live up to her example.

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Music for Friends

At the end of August, I wrote:
In the dark days, I did not think that I would play another recital, but I have scheduled one for Sunday, October 13 at 6 pm. Most of it will be improvisation, for when I realized that I could improvise instead of playing ninety minutes or so of repertoire, it became clear that it was possible, where I probably cannot now play a genuine full recital. I may not be able to do even this much adequately – especially a second half that will be a long-form piano improvisation on hymn tunes, a prospect that seemed liberating when I conceived it, but increasingly fills me with terror – but I am viewing the evening as a last opportunity to play a little music for my friends and I hope that they will overlook a few wrong notes. Maybe a lot of wrong notes, and perhaps they might find some Music in it somewhere.
I resisted (and still resist) calling it a Recital. I am done with such things. Eventually, I called it “Music for Friends.” It helped me to think of it that way – I have nothing to prove and I no longer care what anyone thinks of my playing. It consisted of three parts, which are now on YouTube:

a Free Improvisation at the clavichord
the Six Pieces for Organ by Herbert Howells
and an Improvisation on submitted hymn tunes

For this, I invited my friend Jean to select two or three hymn tunes. I think that her daughter Claire and perhaps her son Ben helped with this. There was one Big Tune - “I bind unto myself today” or St. Patrick’s Breastplate, with its companion Dierdre (“Christ be with me...”) embedded in it. And there was one Little Tune: the canon “Go now in peace” by Natalie Sleeth, We sing this every Sunday in our parish as the children leave for Children’s Chapel (with, on many weeks, me wishing I could go with them). When Jean handed me the envelope with the tunes and I opened it, I must have had an interesting expression on my face, because people giggled.

Well, some questions were settled: the tunes, obviously. The key: I had already decided to play in whatever key the main tune was printed. It seemed good to save “Go now in peace” for near the end, as a prayer for these my friends who were listening. With that, it was time to play. As I said above, St. Patrick’s Breastplate is a Big Tune, and it became immediately clear that it was going to as loud and grand as I could make it. As the piece developed, it bordered on “out of control” more often than I would have liked, with plenty of wrong notes, but it would have been dreadfully wrong to play it safe with such a tune.

I finished. As ever, I had no idea if the work was any good. In listening to it since, I do think that there was some Real Music here and there, for which I am grateful. The part I like best is when it finally turns the corner into “Go now in peace,” about the twelve minute mark. It came to me that this Little Tune was related to Deirdre in some interesting ways, so I was able to play around with that for a while, especially in the coda.

All this was Gift: Soli Deo Gloria.

As for the rest, I was glad that Jean encouraged me to go ahead with the little clavichord improvisation. One Friday afternoon we carried it upstairs from my office to the church and took turns playing it. The sound could hardly be heard at all. But, as Jean said, after a minute or so, one’s listening was transformed, and it could after all be heard in its quiet grace.

And the Howells… It went much better than I could have possibly hoped. No breakdowns from the yips. Wrong notes, yes; but upon several listenings since, it came out the way that I think these pieces should go, within the limitations of our beloved little Pilcher. I am proud to put it on YouTube in hopes that it may help others who want to hear these pieces as a set and perhaps play them.

I had always liked the fifth piece, the “Saraband (in Modo Elegiaco),” less than the others when I have played it by itself. But in the final days of my preparations, I came to understand that it works much better in the context of the other pieces, especially with something close to an immediate attaca from the end of the fourth piece. That makes the Saraband feel like a continuation and ultimately consummation, leaving the air cleared for the final Paean.

I was granted another Gift a few weeks later: the prelude for Evensong was the great Passacaglia of J. S. Bach, and that, like the Howells, went much better than anything I could have hoped. It was not quite my farewell to the great organ works of Bach – the next Sunday I played (badly) the B minor prelude and (somewhat less badly) fugue, and there are a few quiet chorale preludes ahead in Advent – but I am happy that at least I could do the Passacaglia well this one time.

That is enough for today. I have not often written in the Music Box this fall, seeking to focus on Finishing the Course – six Sundays left. I do not know what role the Music Box might play in my retirement, if any. But I thank you my readers for your kind thoughts.

Sunday, October 20, 2019

an Evensong recording

Here is a YouTube recording of our Choral Evensong for October 6, 2019, on the diocesan website. They used the evensong to test equipment and linkages that they plan to use for the diocesan convention later this month, and posted it on YouTube, as they plan to do with the diocesan worship services.

I recommend that you skip the organ prelude and go to the 14:18 mark where the service begins. There is a music list in the comments with links to the various parts of the service. I think that the choir sang well, especially in the Stanford canticles (the B flat service) and the anthem, a part-song by Joseph Haydn. There are several recordings of the Haydn on YouTube, and I think ours stands up well in comparison.

Saturday, August 31, 2019

Lord, now lettest thou thy servant…

To every thing there is a season, and a time for every purpose under the heaven… (Ecclesiastes 3:1)
I have been a church musician for a long time. Long enough, as a variety of indicators are telling me. Therefore, it is my intention to retire from my current post as organist/choirmaster as of the end of December. I announced it to the choirs at their first rehearsal on Wednesday and have duly informed the rector and the senior warden, who replied with a very nice note. I played for her wedding many years ago, and her two sons were choristers until they got too busy with other things as teenagers.

The hardest part is the farewells, and not just to the people. Week after week, pretty much every hymn I play is for the last time. I sometimes wonder whether it is genuinely the last time for some of them – whether any of my successors will ever schedule some of these songs. Church music has changed over these forty-odd years and I have no idea where it will go from here. That indeed is one of the indicators that my work is done.

It is good to play hymns for this congregation. Last Sunday, we sang “Glorious things of thee are spoken,” with Haydn’s magnificent tune Austria. The congregation sang with strength; the sopranos among them launched unbidden into the hymnal’s printed descant. There was no choir; they simply knew to do this, and probably would have sung it whether anyone wanted them to or not.

I will miss them: hymns such as this with substance and history, and the people who sing them.

Another indicator has been the declining quality of my organ playing, or so it seemed for the last couple of years. As I wrote during the time I was struggling with it: “My vocation had a significant shift at the turn of the year [2017 into 2018, that is]… Music, and especially keyboard music, has been a much smaller part of it.”

But recently, I think that my Sunday service playing has improved, and may be the best of my career. Partly, it is the knowledge that “I ain’t got long to stay here,” as the spiritual says. There is freedom in that. Just knowing that my time is short is a liberation, and I think it has helped my playing to be more carefree.

In the dark days, I did not think that I would play another recital, but I have scheduled one for Sunday, October 13 at 6 pm. Most of it will be improvisation, for when I realized that I could improvise instead of playing ninety minutes or so of repertoire, it became clear that it was possible, where I probably cannot now play a genuine full recital. I may not be able to do even this much adequately – especially a second half that will be a long-form piano improvisation on hymn tunes, a prospect that seemed liberating when I conceived it, but increasingly fills me with terror – but I am viewing the evening as a last opportunity to play a little music for my friends and I hope that they will overlook a few wrong notes. Maybe a lot of wrong notes, and perhaps they might find some Music in it somewhere.

As I wrote above, it is clear to me that church music is moving on into directions I cannot fathom. But I take comfort in what I heard this morning at the local farmers’ market: the Skipperlings, in a two-hour gig. Three girls, all of them veterans of our youth choir. It had been almost a year since I heard them as a group, and even though I knew their increasing skill as individuals from choral rehearsals, from the first notes of their gig I was blown away. They have grown mightily as musicians and have gone well beyond anything that I can now teach them.

I cannot go further with the Song, whether in church or in the wider world. But they can, and will. So will the other young singers with whom I have been privileged to work. One of them, Mike W., is now directing choirs of his own.

And that is enough for me. Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace…


------------

Yamaha has a lovely short video, “The Gift.” In the text description, it asks “What have you done to share the gift of music?”

The gift of music was given to me by others. There was my grandmother whom I never knew, dead long before I was born, who taught piano lessons in a West Virginia coal camp. There was my first piano teacher, an ancient white-haired lady (I think she was probably about the age I am now). I learned much later that she graduated from conservatory and had a horrible experience with marriage that lasted only a few weeks. She went to the railroad station, put every penny she had on the counter, and said “How far will this take me?” They answered with the name of my home town. And there she stayed for the rest of her days, “Teaching Little Fingers to Play” (the John Thompson method book she used, and with which I began).

There were teachers at university: several piano teachers (for I was passed from one to another in those years), but equally others: a teacher of first-year Music Theory who played Carpenters songs to demonstrate form and chord progressions; my percussion teacher (my minor instrument) who took this overconfident piano major and ripped him to shreds in his first lesson because he could not play a string of quarter notes on a practice pad with sufficient steady accuracy. “That will do for a pianist, but pianists aren’t real musicians,” he said. “Neither are you. Now go away, and practice until you get this right.”

There was the piano teacher in Vienna from whom I learned nothing. He assessed my keyboard technique as fundamentally flawed, and assigned a strict diet of Czerny exercises. I had come there with visions of learning to play Schubert, for I had played his magical G major Sonata in my junior recital the previous spring and loved him in those days above all other composers. Here I was in Vienna, the city of my dreams, and no Schubert. No Beethoven, or Mozart, or Haydn. Czerny. Nothing but Czerny. And Scales. I do not think that it did me any good. But at the end of my four months of study, he gave me an old volume of Schubert sonatas which I still treasure. I now know that it was as hard on him as it was on me.

There was Mr. F., one of my piano teachers at university who was not granted tenure and moved on to a college in western Iowa, leaving me to others. When I graduated, I called him and asked whether I might come and study intensively with him for a year to prepare for graduate auditions. He not only agreed, but welcomed me into his household as a nanny to his two young children. He taught me two lessons a week without charge, he nudged me toward organ because I so loved to play Bach and did what he considered a fine job with Franck’s Prelude, Chorale, and Fugue for piano. And he more-than-nudged me to the school where I learned piano tuning and repair.

There was Sir John Stainer, and the unknown person who left a tattered copy of his organ method in the bench of the instrument where I had taken a job as Organist, completely innocent of how to play it. I had answered a classified newspaper ad, and told the minister “I do not play the organ, but I am a good pianist and willing to learn.” He said “You’re hired.” So he must be thanked as well for giving me a chance.

There was Martha Livesay, organist at the local Presbyterian church who became my best friend in those days and a constant source of encouragement, then and for decades after. And there was Ralph Mills, who was “Mr. AGO” to me when I needed it. I wrote about him here:
When I was getting started, there was a man, Ralph M., dean of the local chapter there in West Virginia, whose license plate was for many years “MrAGO.” If anyone ever deserved such a term, Ralph was the guy. His cordial welcome to me as a scruffy twenty-something from out in the sticks (I had driven about two hours to get to a meeting) was part of what made me an organist. He helped steer me toward the Guild’s certification exams, and I was able to complete the Associate’s Exam before applying for graduate school. That was part of what got me in, because my credentials were lacking.
There was Dr. McDonald, my organ teacher at the Choir College who was the one who dealt with the abovementioned serious deficiencies. And Erik Routley, and John and Helen Kemp, and Warren Martin, and Joseph Flummerfelt, and many others.

I could go on, and I do not wish to slight those I have not mentioned. But the point remains: the Gift is not mine. I have received it from others, and done what I can to pass it on.

Go thou and do likewise.

Wednesday, July 24, 2019

RSCM Report: Part Two

For we are laborers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, ye are God’s building… But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon. For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if any many build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; every man’s work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is. (I Corinthians 3:9-13)
I have often called upon this passage as a plumb line for my work, properly so. But much of our work is together, including choral work. There is enough music of the wood, hay, and stubble variety in the world; how can we as a group build with gold, silver, and precious stones? We who ourselves are dust and ashes, individually and together?

We can rehearse. We can build our skill level in various ways: lessons, scales and exercises, study. We can indeed become extremely good, like that semiprofessional choir on the eve of the Course. And we may find that for all our perfection we are “as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.” (I Cor. 13:1) For “if I have not charity, I am nothing” (v. 2).

It has something to do with what I call Connection, following my teacher Dr. Flummerfelt. Some others, including one of the composers we sang this week, call it Attitude:
When singing, are you connected to the text and musical line with all of your being? Or are you going through the motions? It might be possible for instrumentalists to sometimes get away with the latter, but the voice is so thoroughly a window into the soul that it is immediately obvious if the singers are not Connected -- and, if the other basics are in place and the group has done its homework, Connection makes it possible for the song to touch the hearts of the listeners. This will never happen if the hearts of the singers are not likewise touched by the Song and absolutely committed to it. [from RSCM Report 2015]
But it also has to do with brokenness.
We have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us. We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed; always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body. (II Corinthians 4:7-10)
A perfect singer, confident in her ability, not a trouble in the world, will not have this treasure. There are not enough cracks for the light to shine through. Those who are carrying health issues, personal or family burdens, a broken heart, those who are derided and ostracized by their peers, or hungry and tired, without money for food and shelter – their song has the potential to become gold, silver, precious stones.

But not in their own strength. Not at all; if you ask such a singer if they are doing well, they will probably sigh and say “I wish! I am not any good at all. Everything I do is wrong, my best efforts are incomplete.”

The Swedish poet Karin Boye gives part of the answer, in an evening prayer we sang during the Course, set to music by Egil Hovland:
… for I know that you can finish what I found of joy or sorrow. All my harmful thoughts and actions, heal and make them new and wholesome. Take my days and make them over. Come, transform their dust to diamond. (translation by Gracia Grindal)
Perhaps the only way we can build the song with precious stones is to begin with dust - the burnt remains of the days in which we feel that we did nothing worthwhile, the hours of work where we have made no visible progress or gone backwards, the hurtful or foolish things we have thought, said, and done. “Come, transform their dust to diamond.”

Perhaps the reason such a song, and such singers, will have Connection and be able to sing truth that touches the hearts of those who hear it, is that the listeners likewise are earthen vessels, broken open so that they might receive the grace of God.

----------------
Thursday, July 18
As torrents in summer,
Half-dried in their channels,
Suddenly rise, tho’ the sky is still cloudless,
For rain has been falling
Far off at their fountains;

So hearts that are fainting
Grow full to o’erflowing,
And they that behold it
Marvel, and know not
That God at their fountains
Far off has been raining!
(H. W. Longfellow, set to music by Edward Elgar)
I am “half-dried in my channel.” Year after year I have sought to do the work that is set before me, to make the liturgy and music better than they would be without me, to teach the Story and the Song to young and old. I am worn out. The Eucharistic liturgy for which I provide music every Sunday brings me little joy, little sustenance. It is “always winter, never Christmas,” as Lewis wrote of Narnia.

It was thus that I came to this day, discouraged by my bad singing and wrong notes, as well as my years and decades of work. Not even last night’s RSCM Evensong could touch me.

I came to Thursday Matins, organized by my friend Judith. And I was healed. The officiant was HMB, chorister from our parish, my godchild and student. She gets it, as was clear from her careful leadership of the Office. As do many others here this week, old and young. And I have been a small part of that for some of them.

This was also the day for the Course’s celebration of the Holy Eucharist. I have almost stopped taking communion at home. But here, there was dignity in the unaltered Rite Two liturgical text, a proper metal chalice (not pottery, such as we use at home). Music: a psalm and anthem.

Most of all, there was joy.

I joined the line of tenors going up to the front. The Body of Christ. The Cup of Salvation, administered by a friend. The prayers. The sending forth. Then midday meal with my friends the adults of the Course.

I had thought this Course might be my last. But on this day I know that I still belong here.

Rehearsals were more relaxed today, the music beginning to fall into place. The young folk had “water activities” as it said on the information sheet, a part of the week that is awaited with high anticipation.

And there was Evensong, the last of the midweek services, this time a full run-through of Saturday night’s music. I was no longer indifferent to it.

-----------------
Of the rest of the week, I need say little. It was very good. Some of the singing at Saturday’s evensong was among the best we have done at a Course, with strong Connection. On Sunday we sang at the Basilica as we have done for some years, this time from the rear gallery. I am told by a trustworthy listener that we sounded “guarded,” and I am inclined to agree. We sang well, but it was hard to connect with a congregation that we could not see. Should we remain in this setting next year, we must find a way to overcome this. But the acoustic placement in the gallery is better, we are not so cramped in, and we have chairs – in the front, we were always crammed onto risers, standing for most of the service. Not in the back; there is enough space for a choir three times our size.

And we are done. I congratulate Michael Velting, our music director for the week, especially noting the manner in which he put the hardest work at the beginning, emphasizing the Preces and Responses and especially the Lord’s Prayer setting in every rehearsal so that by Friday and Saturday, we were comfortable with them. In the same manner, the French diction for the Fauré benefited from an early start and many repetitions. More than that, I admire the manner in which he respected the choristers, expecting the best from them but always treating them with kindness.

The organist for the week, Nick Quardokus, is at this writing in the process of moving to New York City, where he begins work in August as assistant organist of St. Thomas, Fifth Avenue. I encourage you to check him out on YouTube, where I have joined his nine subscribers.

Here is his playing of the Bach chorale Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend (BWV 655), a trio that I dearly love and have played several times for church, never as well as he does here.

After the evensong, I told him that I don’t like most of the organ playing I hear. “Most of it has no Connection,” I said. “But you do.”

May it ever be so. And I hope that he posts more of his work on YouTube.

Soli Deo gloria.

P.S. - I poked around a bit more on YouTube and found this:
Duruflé Requiem, with Nicholas at the organ - and it is my RSCM friend Kristin Lensch and her choir, from Calvary Church, Memphis. What an unexpected delight!

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

RSCM Report: Part One

Répands sur nous le feu de ta grâce puissante.
Que tout l’enfer fuie au son de ta voix.
Dissipe le sommeil d’une âme languissante,
Qui la conduit à l’oubli de tes lois.

Pour on us the fire of your powerful grace,
That all hell may flee at the sound of your voice;
Banish the slumber of a weary soul,
That brings forgetfulness of your laws.
(Jean Racine, from Cantique de Jean Racine [G. Fauré])

One of the adult choirmen said to me on the last evening of the RSCM Course: “The trebles were singing the Phos Hilaron [Andrew Walker, a fine setting which we learned during the week], and I prayed ‘Lord, let me do this forever.’ And I got an answer: ‘You already are.’”

We were standing behind the building where the adults were staying, looking out at the trees in the early evening, after the Saturday evensong. Most of the adults had gone out to dinner; the choristers were cleaning up the common room of the building where they were staying and having the award presentation for the week. It was a time for thoughts of eternity, and its presence here and now in the Song.

I began the week wondering whether this would be my last Course. I have watched older singers in other venues make the choral experience all about their own pleasure from singing, sometimes about the food and accommodations and other aspects of their own physical comfort at the expense of others. I pray that I may never be like this in any aspect of my life but most of all in a choir. The RSCM Courses are not about the adults. They are for the choristers.



The Lord’s Day, July 14
Service above Self (Tulsi Gabbard)
In a sense, my Course begins tonight. We are hosting a concert by a semi-professional chamber choir on this, the night before we travel to RSCM. They were bumped from their scheduled venue only a few days ago and desperately needed a place to perform. Given the timing and my desire for a good night’s sleep, I wished it were otherwise.

The choir is highly skilled. It is a group of well-trained young adult singers from this half of the state who rehearse briefly, sing a complex program in multiple cities (three in thirty hours this weekend, ours being the last) and return to their duties until the next time. They clearly enjoy singing together, and the music is polished, beautiful, gorgeous in our good acoustic (which they loved). It was almost too much sound in their fortissimos; I had to hold my ears. Neither they nor I are used to that in this space.

It is after 11 pm by the time I get home, with an early start tomorrow. And it was clearly the right thing to do.

Monday, July 15

We leave home under a clear hot morning sky, driving south into the remnants of a tropical storm working its way up the Mississippi. First come high wispy clouds, growing thicker and lower, then the rain, hardly a mist at first but steady and growing.

After several years at capacity, this time the Course is again small. There are only two boy trebles, only a small handful of adults. There are plenty of teenage choirmen – a row of eleven bass/baritones, only one of them over the age of twenty-five, and four strong teenage tenors. And there are a sufficient number of girl trebles, eight of them from our parish. Seven of these girls are seated in front of me all week; three directly in front in the second row, four more in the front row. The other trebles, boys and girls, are equally strong and committed to the work at hand, but these seven girls are a special delight to me throughout the week, watching them work hard and be leaders.

By the end of vespers, I am exhausted. In my room, I drink tea and write for a few minutes, then lights out.

Tuesday, July 16
But either in his dreams or out of them, he could not tell which, Frodo heard a sweet singing running in his mind: a song that seemed to come like a pale light behind a grey rain-curtain, and growing stronger to turn the veil all to glass and silver, until at last it was rolled back, and a far green country opened before him under a swift sunrise. (J. R. R. Tolkien: The Lord of the Rings, a passage from the House of Tom Bombadil)
During the morning’s ATB rehearsal, the rain falls steadily outside, a silver curtain almost like snow, falling with a gentleness unlike a typical summer rain in this part of the country. I think of Frodo, and how this might be my last time for singing intensively in this life. By afternoon and the full rehearsal with trebles, I am glad that it might be so. I become short-tempered in our work on the Preces and Responses, a setting which I do not like. I angrily scribble reminders into my score:

FASTER.
PUSH AHEAD.
PROPEL.
WATCH.
LONG EE, NOT SHORT.

It is a lesson in Humility. And Obedience. For most of the year, I am the organist/choirmaster and it is others who must sing the music I select, and sing it mostly the way I tell them. It is very good for me to be here, on the other side of the podium, missing notes and entrances, increasingly frustrated at my bad vocal production and mistakes.

It proved to be our most difficult rehearsal of the week, laying the groundwork for good singing in the coming days. I should know this, but it was hard to see it on this day.

What saves me is seeing the trebles, especially those seven girls from our parish in front of me, watching their discipline and energy, working hard from beginning to end much better than I.
At times our own light goes out and is rekindled by a spark from another person. Each of us has cause to think with deep gratitude of those who have relighted the flame within us. (Albert Schweitzer)

“Thank you for teaching us Music,” one of my choristers from the 1980’s scrawled on a postcard in her childish script, with a hand-drawn bit of treble staff and a few notes for illustration. It has been given me to do this work for two generations of boys and girls. “Teach the Story and the Song,” my Credo sheet says, hanging on the side of my computer: “It is a treasure of inestimable value.”

Tuesday is the first of three midweek Choral Evensongs: the responses (which I still dislike), the Andrew Walker setting of the Phos Hilaron, Psalm 121, the Magnificat. Afterward, I walk as in the old days, enjoying the cool of the evening. Ten or fifteen years ago, I might have walked for an hour or more in the darkness, up the road to the highway, for I never much liked going to the adult gatherings in the evenings; my heart was too full from the music and liturgy to be with others.

No longer can I afford such a walk. It is Tuesday, there is a long way to go, and I am still exhausted from the weekend. After a few minutes, I go to my room and straight to bed.

Wednesday, July 17

I speak of retirement with two of my long-time friends, directors at other churches. It is tempting to tell them “Yes, I’ll come back,” and think that in retirement it can be as it has always been. When the time comes, these farewells will be hard.

In the afternoon rehearsal, there are long stretches when I can listen to the trebles and watch them. A farewell to this sound, these young people, may be hardest of all.

By the end of supper, a wall of black clouds towers above the big house (a former private residence with chapel and pipe organ at one end, where we rehearse). The thunderstorm arrives during rehearsal with lightning, thunder, and heavy rain; it continues through evensong. I am not at all Connected, singing poorly in the responses and the Fauré Cantique de Jean Racine, a piece that I hate to sing so badly. The group sings it well enough for this point in the week, but not me. I am emotionally dead, in a service where I am usually deeply moved.

To be continued.


Tuesday, July 9, 2019

Farewell to a typewriter

The year was about 1987. Larry was running a downtown shop, thinking that he could make a living from computer repairs. He became the authorized dealer and repairman for Commodore computers.

Neither of those ideas worked out. None of us foresaw that people and businesses wouldn’t have their computers repaired; they would trash them as obsolete and buy new ones. Nor was it clear that Commodore, like many others of that era, would soon be driven out of business by Microsoft.

Larry was a genius. If it was possible to repair anything on a computer – even the ones running M$-DOS or Windows – he could do it. But he was on the whole not a great businessman.

Larry persevered, he and his shop growing increasingly decrepit as the years passed. Stuff that might somehow be useful piled on the shelves, and later overflowed onto the floor so that eventually one could barely walk through the store.

I loved his shop and would go in every chance I got. I bought, sold, and traded various items with him, including one – my Lotus SmartSuite software – that I still use every day. One day, I saw the typewriter, sitting in a corner with boxes piled around it.

“What’s that?” I asked. “That,” he said “is a Royal long-carriage manual typewriter, in excellent condition.” He added: “Ten dollars and it’s yours.” He had taken it as partial trade-in from someone buying a computer, because that’s how Larry operated.

And so it came to pass. It was indeed a handsome machine, in its day (circa 1950) a top-of-the-line piece of business equipment. It was smooth and elegant to use, like playing an Aeolian-Skinner or driving an old Cadillac or Lincoln, the kind that had fins on the back. Later, I found a typing table from the same era that fit it perfectly, and I would use the typewriter from time to time for letters on church letterhead, typing addresses on envelopes, and making file folder labels.

But its days were numbered. The stationary store that sold ribbons closed. I bought two in their going-out-of-business sale, and soon became chary of overusing the machine, not sure what I would do when the ribbons ran dry. Larry finally gave up and closed, too.

I have moved it. Twice. It is not a trivial undertaking; the typewriter weighs in at about fifty pounds, the typing table about the same. Not a piece of plastic in the whole thing: heavy, solid steel, made to last.


It passed the “spark joy” test last year when I applied KonMarie methods to everything in my possession. Just looking at it brings memories of a far-distant era. But I have found that once is not enough for the “spark joy” sorting of possessions, not if a move lies in the not-too-distant future. I must cut away more of them, and have done so, disposing of about half of my organ music, another third of my books, and much else. It is not enough to part with everything that fails to spark joy; one must also part with things one loves, increasingly so as the years go by. Ask anyone who has moved from a house to assisted living or a nursing home.

And there was that typewriter. It has sat in the corner of my office, snug under its dust cover, for nigh on twenty years. I do not think that I have used it even once. It has got to go.
If you are uncertain whether to keep it, ask your heart. (Marie Kondo)
I removed the cover, rolled in a sheet of paper, and started typing. The ribbon is a little faint after all these years, but it improved as I got past the part that had been exposed. It works perfectly, and still brings that spark of joy. But as Marie suggests, I asked my heart and got the answer: “It is all right to let it go.”

Today I loaded it in my Prius and took it to the Mennonite thrift shop. The lady receiving donations was delighted; she commented “This is really nice.” I saw a similar machine on eBay for about $130, without the matching typing table and in considerably worse condition. It is my hope that the Mennonites will get some money from it for their good works, and that the machine will find a new home where it will be loved and perhaps used. It would like that, for it was built for hard work, eight hours a day of typing. Keeping a business office going. Writing novels. That sort of thing, not sitting in a corner under a dust cover.

What I have done by moving it twice and keeping it for thirty-plus years is this: I gave it a shelter, keeping it safe from that day in the 1980’s when it was a piece of heavy, obsolete junk to a time when it is now a “vintage” machine, sought by collectors.

Go in peace, my friend. Find a place of honor and bring joy to someone new.


Sunday, July 7, 2019

One more week

The RSCM St. Louis Course begins July 15, a week from tomorrow. Here is a YouTube clip from the Course way back in 2010: Kyrie, from Messe Solenelle (L. Vierne)

As you can see from the photo in the second half of the clip, the Course was much smaller in those days. I am proud of the trebles – indeed, of the choristers on all of the parts – for making the big sound needed for the Vierne.

I wish there were more YouTube clips from the Courses. From the few available, I chose this one to give a taste of the Cathedral Basilica of St. Louis (note especially the reverberation at the end).

As it happens, 2010 was a year when I wrote at length about the Course. Here is a link to the first of eight essays. Some may wish to read them all; just click “newer post” at the bottom of the first, and it will take you to the second and right on through. I will quote from the eighth and last:

Among the young people (and sometimes those not so young), there are always many tears at the final Evensong on Sunday, and the ensuing farewells, the Course completed. It is right that it be so, for we do not know when or if we will meet again in this mortal life. Every year, some old friends are missing. The day will eventually come when we will be the ones missing, or when the Course is no more.

It occurs to me that I have probably attended more Courses than any but a handful of people. I began taking boys to Belmont Abbey and girls to Atlanta back in the mid-80's, and have been either there or at the St. Louis course almost every year since. The Belmont Abbey and Atlanta Courses no longer exist, though some of the principals from those days are active in other Courses. The boys and girls from those days are now adults, many of them with children of their own. I very much doubt that I will see any of them again in this life….

As I have said several times in these pages, there is a special bond between those of us who have sung at these Courses, all the more so when we have sung together for a number of years. I believe that such bonds, and the similar bonds one has with others in this life, sometimes people we encounter only for a brief time, are a manifestation of the Communion of Saints which we affirm in the Creed. I can easily think of a score of choristers and directors with whom I have sung who have since passed out of this life, and I miss them, sometimes very much. Once, they were young; they learned to sing in the company of those of the generation before them and in turn they taught us, directly or by example. We are bound as choristers into a seamless web across the generations.

We will see one another again, in this life or the next. We will sing again with one another, and the years apart shall be as yesterday when it is past.

Thursday, June 27, 2019

Concert tuning

It is the annual week-long chamber music festival, for which our parish is the venue. Most years they don’t use a piano, but this time they are. It is our beloved Steinway Model L six-foot grand, the one the rebuilder once said was “unsuitable for serious work.” Last night it was on stage for a professional concert.

When I worked as a piano technician, I tuned spinets and old uprights. It was a rural area and few people had much money; none of them had high-end grand pianos. The best piano I serviced in those days was a Wurlitzer baby grand; a few of the older uprights were good, as well. But no concert tunings, other than preparing the church's upright for a couple of recitals of my own.

In a sense the concert tuning started two weeks ago. The piano had gone sharp with the damp weather, so I brought it back down to A=440, retuned it from its slightly unequal temperament to Equal Temperament just like they taught me in school, and spent several hours doing a careful job, knowing that I would nonetheless have to come back to it. I had to rush the tuning of the bottom octaves because of an impending evening church service, but I felt good about the rest of the piano.

A fortnight passed. This past Sunday afternoon, I tuned it again. It is much easier to work with a piano that is already at pitch and basically in tune, but I still spent an hour or so on it, this time devoting the patient care to the low end that it deserves. As is my custom, I finished with end-to-end slow arpeggios to enjoy the beautiful sound, stopping to improve a few notes. This is a really good piano, in a good acoustic.

Tuesday morning before the players arrived, I checked it again. I had expected to need only a few minutes; it took about an hour, getting the high treble right and cleaning up unisons here and there. Again, the slow arpeggios. I love this piano, and this room.

Wednesday morning, after it had done a hard day’s work on Tuesday: another touch-up, this time just a few unisons, fifteen or twenty minutes. Wednesday afternoon in the brief interval between their rehearsal and the evening Eucharist, with concert on its heels: a final check. Three unisons were slightly off, and the highest G needed retuning; I had left it a little flat. The old piano was ready for showtime, maybe the best she has ever sounded. I closed the lid, gave it a caress and said “play well.”

It did: a Shostakovich piano trio that pushed the piano to its limits, the other instruments as well. As someone commented afterwards, “it felt like the room was shaking.”

Thursday morning: another touch-up before the players arrive, with another concert tonight that includes the Franck violin sonata. Again, the work was simply the cleaning up of a few unisons, about twenty minutes. I was pleased that the tuning held up so well after the pounding it received last night.

When the paths of Piano Technician and Church Musician diverged in my late twenties, I took the other path, away from professional piano work. It surprises me that here, almost at the end of my musical career, a Concert Tuning has come my way.

Sitting in the audience for the concert, it was like having a student on stage. I was attentive to the clear high octaves in the Shostakovich, listening for unisons or “off” notes, happy when the piano sounded so well, delighted with how well she performed.

It was, of course, not just the piano who played well. Dominic Cheli was the guest artist; here is his website, where one can find recordings of his work, including his two commercial CDs. He is a fine young pianist, winner of the 2017 Concert Artists Guild competition. In light of my current topic, this quote from one of his reviews is appropriate: “Mr. Cheli’s performance of Prokofiev’s 2nd Piano Concerto ‘roared like a locomotive, shot firebrands of energy this way and that, while the piano strained to keep in one piece under the thrall of Cheli’s glorious technique.’”

Wednesday night’s Shostakovich was cut from the same cloth, and our old piano took it all in stride. I am so proud of her.

Sunday, June 9, 2019

How I practice: an addendum

I last described my practice methods here, in 2017, complete with a YouTube demonstration.

As described here, I began experiencing what golfers would call the “yips.”

I continue to experiment, and I continue to have problems from time to time; today’s playing was clean, but some of last Sunday’s was not.

I have had a degree of success from what I consider an important modification to my practice methods, and have updated the 2017 posting. In short, I start more gently. On the first day’s work with a new piece (or an old one, returned to after months or years), I begin with three slow play-throughs of a short segment, typically two to four measures.

And for that phrase, I call it a day and move on.

The rhythmic work which is at the heart of my practicing waits for the second day. I suspect that pressing on with it on the first day, before the mind has had time to process the slow play-throughs, created a level of tension that ultimately led to difficulties.
---------------
After a long hiatus, I have posted a recording to YouTube; it is the choir's rendition of the Preces and Responses by Richard Sanderson, as sung for the Feast of the Epiphany 2019. It can be found here.

Sunday, June 2, 2019

A good idea, and a life in church music


“You should start a reference file,” he told us. John S. C. Kemp, that is, in his church music class at the Choir College, long ago. “Any time you run across a piece of choral music that you think might be useful, keep it. You will be glad you did.”

He was right.

I puzzled briefly over how to organize it, deciding to follow the system used by the Choir College, which in those days had what must have been one of the finest collections of choral octavos in the world, filling most of a room. The first accession is number one, the next one is number two, with all of them hole-punched and kept in ring binders. They had a card catalogue for searches of the collection by composer or title.

I had a few dozen things in a bulging file folder from my days as a fledgling church musician before graduate school, so I began with those, choosing one at random: an arrangement of “The King of love my Shepherd is” by John Ness Beck, number 0001 in my collection. It remains a useful, straightforward arrangement of this hymn and I have used it with two choirs over the years.

Like the Choir College, I began with a card file as index. Not many years later, I designed a database on my new Commodore 128 computer, adding many other search fields. In due time, I was able to move the database and other files that were important to me over to the new MS-DOS computer in the church office where (by that time) I was working. DOS 6.0, I think it was. None of this Windows stuff, not yet. I remain thankful for a long-obsolete bit of software: the Big Blue Reader, by SOGWAP (the company’s name, an acronym for “Son of God with all Power,” Romans 1:4). It allowed the user to read and write DOS-readable diskettes from the C-128 diskette drive.

Eventually, my database ended up in Lotus Approach, part of their excellent office software package, which is still what I use by preference: Lotus Word Pro, Lotus Organizer, Lotus 1-2-3. The database retains some limitations from the C-128 days when such matters as field length and file size were important, but it has served its purpose.

The latest item in the collection is number 2090, “Rejoice in the Lamb” by Benjamin Britten, following hard on the heels of #2089, the Collegium Regale evening canticles by Herbert Howells. Both were from a RSCM Course, as is much of the material in the database.

But I don’t keep everything. From last year’s Course, I added nothing.

For decades, I was a member of the American Choral Directors’ Association, and thus received mailings from choral publishers. I also subscribed to three publishers' listings, where for a small fee they sent single copies of all their new publications [MorningStar, GIA, and Oxford, for those who might be interested in such things]. Music workshops and conferences often include reading sessions, where a clinician puts a selection of choral music in front of a group of directors, who sight-read the packet. All of these venues were sources for good material that has been essential to my work.

And there was a lot that was less useful, especially in the unsolicited publishers’ mailings. All told, I would guess that I have kept perhaps one out of every thirty or forty titles that have crossed my path. That implies that I have sampled 60,000 or more over the years.

It makes you a better sight-reader.

More to the point, it gives you the tools to plan a choral season with music that will hopefully be of interest to the singers, within their skills as a group, appropriate to each Sunday’s liturgy, and accessible to the congregation.

Looking back over these 2090 octavos and books, I can trace my life in the church music profession. Lots of “practical” music, like the John Ness Beck item that begins the collection. Many things that I have sung and played with choirs in one or another place where I have worked, though these account for only a fraction of the collection, a quarter or less. Many hundreds of things that I would dearly love to do, but have never had the right opportunity.

Some items are reminders of one-time events which I can never possibly repeat: #1397, the Berlioz Te Deum, sung with the Choir College and the New York Philharmonic for an anniversary concert at Carnegie Hall. #1399, “An die Freude,” the final movement of Beethoven’s Ninth. We sang this twice with the Philharmonic in Avery Fischer Hall (as it was then known); the one I remember most fondly was under the baton of Rafael Kubelik.

For that matter, #2089 and #2090, the Howells and Britten mentioned above: our singing of these things at the 2017 RSCM Course with Stephen Buzard was something we repeated at home, for Choral Evensong in May 2018. But I cannot imagine a situation where we could do either of them again.

Others are old friends: #0026, Let the peoples praise thee, O God (Wm. Mathias). #0278, the Preces and Responses by Byrd, Morley, Tomkins and (especially) Wm. Smith, in the Church Music Society edition of Dr. Watkins Shaw. #1282, Stanford in C. #1544, Messiah, by G. F. Handel.

It has been a good run.
Bless, O Lord, us thy servants who minister in thy temple: grant that what we sing with our lips we may believe in our hearts, and what we believe in our hearts we may shew forth in our lives; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Tulsi Gabbard

In 2015-16, I supported Bernie Sanders. With millions of others, I watched as Mrs. Clinton stole the Democratic nomination from him, using the supposedly impartial Democratic National Committee as an arm of her campaign. “Democracy is messy,” I think Bernie said at the Democratic convention.

And I watched as Donald Trump became President of the United States.

Senator Sanders is running again, this time with a strong network of supporters and volunteers. They had an organizing day last Saturday, April 27, with three gatherings at homes in our county and thousands of similar gatherings across the country. I continue to respect Bernie, but this time, I am supporting a different candidate.

Tulsi Gabbard is a congresswoman from Hawaii. She came to my attention in 2016 when she endorsed Bernie, one of the few members of Congress to do so, and gave the nomination speech for Sanders at the Democratic National Convention.

She and Sanders are in agreement on most issues, with solidly progressive ideals. Bernie tends to emphasize domestic needs such as Medicare-for-all; Tulsi speaks constantly about stopping the stream of “regime-change” wars such as Iraq and Syria and Yemen and now Venezuela that are bleeding this country dry.

She is a long-shot among some twenty Democratic contenders. Like Bernie, she is loathed by the establishment. Unlike Bernie, she is going to have a hard time being heard, and she is not going to have the Big Money that some of the “safe” candidates will have to push their views in the media.

I commend to you this six-minute video, wherein an Afghan-American woman speaks her heart about the war that has destroyed her homeland and Tulsi responds. I think it gives a good sense of who she is, why she is running for president, and why it is going to be so difficult. Yes, she is a long shot. So was Bernie when he started, and he would have won on a level playing field. So was an obscure first-term senator from Illinois in 2007-08, some guy named Obama.

And that is what gives me a glimmer of hope. I think that Tulsi could come from nowhere in Iowa, as Obama did. But in 2007, it looked to me like Obama had a lot of money behind him. Tulsi is not going to have anything like that. If she is to win, it is going to have to be from the support of ordinary people. Like me.

And I am not going to be able to do much. I am barely able to hang on with my bounden duties as organist/choirmaster and husband. I have made financial contributions to both of them, Bernie and Tulsi, and will stand up for Tulsi on caucus night in February. And pray for both of them, and for this country.

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

The organ at Notre Dame: an update

This is worth a new posting, so that more people will see it:
From the online journal "Vox Humana":
After the fire: Here's what we know about the Organs at Notre Dame de Paris

From Philippe Lefebvre:
“After the stupor and the dread, the unbearable sadness, and the devastating images of this tragedy: the Great Lady has valiantly withstood the worst — Notre Dame is still standing. Thank you for your well wishes, your testimonies of friendship, and solidarity.

“It is confirmed that, for the moment, the Grand Organ has escaped disaster. No melted pipes, but a lot of dust, particles, soot, etc. Water, of course, but no flooding.

“It will require more in-depth expertise to measure the extent of the damage. The Choir Organ has been doused in water and it is undoubtedly more damaged than the Grand Organ.

Thanks be to God.

Notre Dame: 15 April 2019

There are no words.

This building, where all roads in France converge.... It survived the French Revolution, centuries of wars and tumults, including two world wars and Nazi occupation in the last century. And now much of it is gone.

In the larger grief over what has been lost, I grieve for Olivier Latry, organist of Notre Dame, who has lost the instrument and place that he loves.

I commend to you two videos: the first is a short excerpt which has been noted by many, wherein Kenneth Clark begins his work "Civilisation"
"What is civilisation? I don't know. I can't define it in abstract terms - yet. But I think I can recognize it when I see it." He turned toward the cathedral, Notre Dame: "And I am looking at it now."

The second video is long, almost an hour. Among other things, it includes a lovingly detailed tour of the insides of the instrument, in its present form built by Cavaille-Coll and much modified, including a major restoration finished in 2012.

"In the belly of the organ of Notre Dame" (French, with subtitles).

If nothing else, watch the first moments, wherein Mr. Latry climbs the stairs, turns on the blower, seats himself at the console in the darkened church, and begins the Carillon de Westminster (by Louis Vierne, former organist of Notre Dame), and the lights of the church come on.

And now it is gone, or at the least extensively damaged.

When I wrote this earlier today (April 16), initial reports had been that the three rose windows were destroyed; now we know that they survived. Likewise, initial report was that the organ was destroyed; at this writing, they are saying its status is not yet known.

Another, more encouraging update on the organ, important enough that I made a new posting so that more people would see it:

---------
From the conservative columnist and blogger Rod Dreher: I think that his thoughts on the survival of the rose windows apply as well to the survival of at least major portions of the organ.
Hope in the ruins
So: I see the image above [in the linked essay] — of the light shining through the rose window, onto the ashes of Notre Dame cathedral — and I see a Sign. Beauty, order, and harmony were not consumed by the fire. The light that streams into the cathedral through the rose windows passes through colors arranged in such a way as to illustrate scenes from humanity’s mortal life. The rose window tells us that God — who, to the medievals, is Light — manifests Himself by passing through the stains of our mortality. He is everywhere present, He fills all things. Even when we sin — as some of the smaller in the west portal rose window depict — God is present, illuminating the sacredness of life, drawing even our frailty and brokenness into harmonious lines bursting with color, and life, and meaning.


------------------
To hear all of the Vierne piece, it is here.
There is a YouTube channel for the instrument and its music: The Great Organ


Sunday, February 17, 2019

A Fugue, and Five Hundred Essays

On Friday, I attended a lecture on Buxtehude by Craig Cramer, distinguished organist at Notre Dame University. Most of his talk was analysis of a Praeludium by Buxtehude. Not a “prelude and fugue” as they were called when I was an organ student, but a single unified piece that among other elements contains several fugues, three in this case.

Being an improviser, I tried it on my own later that day, seeing if I could make something in Buxtehude’s form. It was thoroughly bad.

Not a surprise; my first effort at anything new is always thoroughly bad.

But the idea percolated overnight, and bumped into my Sunday improvisation. I had been struggling with it all week, for the only one of the tunes in the service that I was willing to work with was Engelberg, the fine tune by Stanford often sung with the text “When in our music God is glorified.” In this case it is another text, “We know that Christ was raised and dies no more,” commenting on the selection from I Corinthians 15 appointed in the lectionary. I had been “learning the tune” as is my custom, playing around with it on the clavichord every morning, but not having any ideas as to how to approach it beyond a vague notion of playing variations.

Well! What if I were to begin with a fugue, with the subject related thematically to the tune, and give out the tune near the end as a coda? I spent about twenty minutes fiddling around with this on Saturday, still making no significant progress.

On Sunday mornings, I rarely have time to begin at the piano, for my organ practice must be completed by 7:15 and Matins. But today, I could spare a few minutes, so I made a beginning at the Steinway up in the church – and there it was; a fugue subject that was related to the tune, and with which I thought I could work. That was too good to leave to chance, so I scurried downstairs for staff paper and scribbled out the subject and its tonal answer, settling on the key of A Dorian by writing these things down. I improvised with it some more in the break between Matins and the 9:00 service, perhaps fifteen minutes, and it was time to play.

Here it is, my first public effort at an improvised fugue:

00’14” - I run off the tracks immediately; I play the tonal answer incorrectly, even though it was written down right in front of me. I turn it into a false entry, and give the real thing at 00’19”
00’27” - parallel octaves between bass and soprano. Red ink is mounting up, and I don’t even have all the voices in yet.
00’45” - a final entry in the bass
00’58” - time to finish the Exposition (the first part of a fugue) and go into Other Stuff (technical term: Episode). Again I fall off the tracks, and throw in a few more fugal entries in the existing voices. It could charitably be called a Second Exposition.
01’11” - finally, an Episode. About time.
01’24” - back to the fugue subject. At 01’30” I try to get fancy with the subject in inversion. I think it works pretty well. Heartened by this, at 01’39” is the subject in augmentation in the bass.

And so it goes: some good, some not so good. The opening fugal section winds down by 02’30”. Here, I am making a transition into the hymn tune. At 03’03” is a final (for now) harmonized statement of the fugue subject. It ends with an important transition: the C major chord at 03’20”. This sets the stage for the head motive of Engelberg, which (in C major, as I am going to play it) outlines a C major triad. I introduce the tune in the soprano, still overshadowed by echoes of the fugue subject in A dorian. This is a good idea, so I go with it to the 04’42” mark. Here I leave the tune and start a new fugal section, with a vague notion of suggesting rondo form: Fugue – Tune – Fugue etc.
05’08” - rather surprisingly (to me), the Tune returns in the soprano and takes over completely for a bit.
05’46” - Engelberg continues, now in minor, becoming major. This quiet little passage turned out well. And it keeps me on track with my notion of rondo form: so far we now have Fugue – Tune – Fugue – Tune.
06’42” - enough quiet; it is time for some motion and energy, leading back to the fugue. The subject enters in the bass at 06’55”.
07’22” - Coda (a bit early in terms of the clock: I still have almost two minutes to cover). I seek to make quiet combinations of the fugue subject and motives from the tune. By 08’05”, it leads to a final fugal exposition.
08’31” - Schoenberg wrote about “dissolving” as a way to bring a passage to conclusion, giving examples from Beethoven and others: take a short bit of your material, work with it, become simpler and simpler. This is what I am doing here, using a five-note descending scale.
09’01” - a final playthrough of the hymn tune in the bass, and we are finished.

Overall, I am pleased, especially as a first effort. I have listened to the piece several times this afternoon and I think it holds together, despite the red ink for contrapuntal errors. The problems I hear are these:
- It is too long for its material, and demonstrates why fugues tend to be a little shorter than this.
- Related to that, I got tired of hearing the fugue subject by the end. Were I to play another piece of this scale (and I must; this is the size of piece that is needed as a prelude to the 9:00 service), I should consider a double or triple fugue – perhaps something along the lines of a Buxtehude Praeludium. Of which I made complete hash on Friday afternoon; I am not anywhere near ready to try such a thing in public.
- There are too many passages where the texture is simply the longish fugue subject all by itself, or perhaps with one other voice or chordal accompaniment. This is Not Counterpoint. I would give these passages some more red ink.

But I really did like the transition to Engelberg (03’03” and following) and the quiet passage at 05’46”, and the ending, and my comfort level with the Dorian mode.

------------------------------
This is my five hundred and first post in The Music Box. I started in February 2010, nine year ago this week. Thank you, my readers. Most of the time, it is around thirty or forty of you. Certain categories of essays draw more readers, especially when I mention a conflict that tore the United States asunder in the mid-nineteenth century; I am trying to not write about it now that its sesquicentennial is in the past. Improvisation-related essays such as this and the previous are also popular.

The second-most-read essay is from 2012: In defense of choral evensong. Many of its 445 readers probably came from Bosco Peters’ excellent liturgy website, which is a Real Blog, the sort that reaches thousands of people and makes a genuine difference, which he does. But I still think I was right in defending choral evensong.

The most-read essay, with an astonishing 1457 readers, is one of the two sermons I have preached (there are several Imaginary Sermons in these pages as well, but this one was real, given at Choral Evensong for the Second Sunday of Easter, 2010): No more a stranger nor a guest.

I have been absent from the Music Box for two months. There are reasons, the first being Advent and Christmas. More recently, I have sought a Change of Habit, best expressed in the Zen proverb:
When walking, walk.
When eating, eat.
I used to do most of my writing as I ate at my desk at work. I love eating and writing, separately and together. But I decided to give Mindful Eating a chance, and I do not think that I will go back. Food is too precious and notable as a gift from God to do other than partake of it with mindfulness, thanksgiving, and full enjoyment. I should know this principle, for I have always been this way with music; I cannot comprehend how people can have music playing in the background as they work. When I listen to music, I listen. So I am simply doing the same with food.

The obvious drawback: I don’t get so many things done. It is not just the writing of essays; I am not reading much, something else I used to do with food and tea at my side.

But my sense is that the work I do get done is a little better, benefiting from better focus. My intention is to continue writing in the Music Box, but it may be infrequently.

Blessings be with you all, and God's grace.